The lasting benefits of SDP participation

By Vicki Nash, SDP Course Director

From reading the blog posts written by our SDP alumni, it should be obvious how much all our students enjoy the programme. The combination of thought-provoking seminars, supportive peer engagement and helpful faculty advice is one that’s hard to beat, especially when it’s served up alongside stunningly beautiful architecture and a healthy dose of socialising.

But whilst the immediate satisfaction of participation is worth celebrating, for me, the greatest benefits take rather longer to emerge. We state that there are two aims of the programme: to support and improve PhD dissertations, and to build a strong peer network. Demonstrating such effects (any effects!) is challenging for a social scientist J, but I can at least offer some examples of the ways in which we think we’ve helped.

On the thesis front, we can’t hope to replace the continuous support of supervisors. But it’s often valuable to share and talk through problems. Some of the most obvious wins are methodological. Many of our faculty specialise in innovative methods designed to capture and tame digital data. In the past few years I’ve seen students learn about new tools that halve their Twitter data analysis time, share coding tips to scrape their own data, and find ways of revising research questions that better support their own research. Add to that the value of non-judgmental peer support and understanding at moments when the dissertation just seems impossible, and it’s easy to understand why so many of our participants say in their evaluations that the course has helped improve their thesis. Shane Horgan’s blog from last year’s SDP explains how the programme helped him.

As for the value of a strong peer network, from a social perspective that has worth just in and of itself. But again experience suggests that our SDP cohorts do more than simply support each other as friends, rather they find ways of working together in professional relationships that really last. Just a few examples from recent years: in terms of publications, Andrew Schrock (SDP 2013) and Jeremy Hunsinger (SDP 2004 and alumni tutor) have co-edited both a special journal issue and a forthcoming book on hacker and maker movements; Marcus Foth and Laura Forlano (both 2004) co-edited (with colleagues) this great book on urban informatics, and two 2012 participants Kevin Driscoll and Shawn Walker co-authored this great paper on transparency in the collection and production of big Twitter data. Conference panels also seem popular, such as this one from AOIR 2015 on fame and micro-celebrity organised by five members of the 2014 SDP cohort or the 2016 AOIR panel on ‘The Rules of Engagement: Managing Boundaries, Managing Identities’ involving Sander Swartz and Stacy Blasiola (both SDP 2014). Last but not least, we often hear about joint projects such as the ongoing work on editors of Chinese Wikipedia between OII’s Taha Yasseri, SDP 2016’s Meg Zheng and Grace Benefield or the Access My Info project developed by a Citizen Lab team that included collaboration between Lokman Tsui (SDP 2005) and Sonny Zulhuda (SDP 2008). I wish I had space to list more!

These are just a handful of the examples of the ongoing academic collaboration that develops from the lasting relationships built at the OII’s Summer Doctoral Programme. All the evidence suggests that our participants gain both immediate and longer-term benefits from attending, a fact which makes us enormously proud. I believe we’ve also even had an SDP wedding, but I’m not technically allowed to use that in the advertising…

“An experience incomparable to any other thus far in my PhD journey” — Shane Horgan remembers SDP2016

By: Shane Horgan

The Oxford Internet Institute’s Summer Doctoral Programme represents an experience incomparable to any other thus far in my PhD journey. In a somewhat futile attempt to summarise my experience of the OII SDP into a few introductory words, the SDP of 2016 united 30 PhD researchers by our shared endeavor, experiences and — needless to say — exasperations. From the outset and over the course of two beautiful summer weeks in Oxford, the SDP fostered a stimulating and supportive environment that gave rise to endless discussion, debate and development. It is the foundation on which an international network of friends has been built, future collaborations planned and a group which I am immensely proud to be a part of.

2016’s SDP took place at the OII’s main building at 1 St Giles, a place in which we very quickly felt at home. On the daily walk from our accommodation at Hertford College to St Giles you are not only confronted with architectural beauty often left to the work of computer generated images, but with so dense a history of intellectual exploration and cultural landmarks it is difficult to be anything but enthused and inspired each and every day. The programme’s schedule is primarily structured around staff and guest lectures, and student presentations. The diversity of students’ disciplinary backgrounds and PhD topics was matched by those of the speakers, whose work generated enough conversation to deafen the patrons in any of Oxford’s institutional watering holes we regularly found our way to.

Prior to SDP I hadn’t presented to an audience whose focus was solely on the Internet and society. Criminology’s theoretical toolbox is still adapting and developing itself to life in the information society and what the internet means for crime, the causes of crime and responses to it. In addition to the rigorous and constructive feedback from a range of perspectives, the support and encouragement of the SDP cohort, the OII staff and guest speakers quickly allayed my perpetually crippling podium fright. Seldom is there an opportunity to have the attention and curiosity of such an engaged multidisciplinary group who can open your eyes to the wider lenses under which you can examine your work or approach a research question, as well as its uses beyond those you previously considered. This feedback isn’t solely confined to those 20 minutes, and that is the magic of the SDP. You have two weeks in which to discuss, deconstruct and unpack your work and the work of those around you in intimate detail; in the pub, in the punt, playing croquet and on the roof (also a pub). It is no exaggeration to say that my SDP experience had a positive transformative effect on both my current work and my approach to research generally.

I think it is worth mentioning that SDP 2016 coincided with troubling times for the UK and Europe. Here is not the place to discuss this in depth, and to do so would be to oversimplify a very complex issue. It is enough to say that it remains a time of uncertainty and insecurity for students and academics alike, where Brexit and its implications are never far from any discussion. I mention this because SDP represents, at least for me, the anti-thesis of the meaning of Brexit and the ideas that gave rise to it. The OII SDP is a truly global gathering of scholars who are concerned with problems that affect us all, regardless of who you are, where you’re from, or what state you live in. It is a manifestation of the importance and value of international perspectives, cooperation, and collaboration. It is an example of what you can learn when curiosities are limited only by imagination.

I have found it incredibly difficult to consolidate what I want to say about SDP. In part, because so much happened in such a short time, but foremost because of my wish to do justice to my cohort and our shared experience. I think that in itself goes some way towards capturing a glimpse of OIISDP 2016’s essence.

profile%20photoShane is a PhD Candidate in Criminology at Edinburgh Law School, University of Edinburgh in affiliation with the Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research. His research explores public sensibilities towards crime and disorder online, and the strategies people employ to manage online risk in their everyday lives.

Take a Chance In Presenting

By: Jenny Korn

“Do one thing every day that scares you.” — Eleanor Roosevelt

Congratulations! You got into OII, and you’re gonna make memories, for sure. One of those memories might involve your (mandatory) presentation during your two weeks in the OII SDP. Now that you’re here, what kind of presentation are you going to share?

Depending on the order you were given, you might have the benefit of watching others present before you. You’ll note that some folk will give rehearsed presentations on material familiar to them. They will exhibit little anxiety as they share their research in ways that they have done before in front of other academic audiences. And you are welcome to give that type of presentation because the OII does not set requirements for the talks you give while here.

However, I would encourage you to choose to take a chance when you present. During my OII SDP experience in 2015, I was impressed by my peers. They were smart and passionate. And they gave excellent feedback, paying close attention to our presentations. To receive thoughtful suggestions from such an intelligent, knowledgeable audience was an opportunity I wanted to seize, but I was scared to share new research that had not been tested yet. Still, using my OII presentation as my deadline, I finally made myself write up ideas that had been percolating for years.

So, on July 9, 2015, I did something I’ve never done before and haven’t done since: I presented actual work-in-progress. Up until then, my experience with academia was that our peer audiences reward only pretty-much completed research shared in an understandable way. But what about the initial stages of development of our work? Where do we share the beginnings of research with little data collection? I discovered that an answer was the OII SDP. What I presented was rough, unpolished, and real. I felt vulnerable and nervous. But I also felt determined and hopeful.

It wasn’t until I presented this material for the first time that I realized how much my project meant to me, which was evident in my being moved to tears. I was surprised (and embarrassed) at how emotional I got during my presentation, but I am grateful that I was surrounded by the caring and kind colleagues that made up the OII cohort of 2015 (y’all know who you are). And I appreciate Vicki’s immediate hug, compassion that I will remember always. When was the last time you gave a scholarly presentation and received a hug in response? The OII SDP is full of positively delightful surprises.

Whichever method or issue you choose to present during your OII experience, I wish you good luck. If you see a colleague struggling during the presentation, extend some empathy. If you are that person, know that you are not alone. If there’s anything I may do personally to support you in your journey, please contact me on Twitter @JennyKorn and at or on Facebook at I welcome your questions and highly recommend you say “yes” to risk-taking. And to punting.

Welcome to our growing community of OII SDP peers, alumni, and faculty!

JennyKornJenny Korn is a scholar-activist of race, gender, identity, and media with academic training in communication, sociology, theatre, public policy, and gender studies from Princeton, Harvard, Northwestern, and the University of Illinois at Chicago, where she is a doctoral student.

OII SDP 2015, or the place where I learned about the Internet through Wormhole Cats, Punting Mishaps, and Magic Mike XXL

By: Luis Felipe Alvarez León

During the summer of 2015 I attended the OII Summer Doctoral Programme. I applied because I thought it would be a good way to start off my last year in the PhD and (finally!) bring together the different parts of my doctoral research. A friend and colleague, Cameran Ashraf, had attended the 2013 SDP and had recommended I apply. Noting the positive terms in which he spoke of this programme certainly generated high expectations on my part. However, these were surpassed by the personally and professionally transformative experience that I had at SDP this past summer.

From the first day it was clear that this was much more than an academic gathering or a place to discuss ideas and works in progress. The combination in terms of disciplines, experiences, backgrounds and personalities present within our group enabled a process of community building that began almost immediately. This allowed attendees to develop a sense of comfort in sharing their ideas, debating them and getting feedback in an honest, open, respectful, and productive environment. Beyond the terms of our research, the exchanges and interactions at SDP had the rare quality of getting participants to reflect on core components of our outlook on the world, such as the preconceptions, assumptions, and beliefs underlying our academic and everyday practice. This was done in an setting characterized by trust, intellectual rigor and respect that allowed us to push each other to sharpen our ideas, go beyond our comfort zone, and even address the difficulties, challenges and (sometimes) risks associated with our research.

The schedule at SDP combined in equal parts presentations by OII and guest faculty, students, and social activities. These three parts were organically woven into a two-week long intensive experience that was as challenging as it was enjoyable. Presentations by guest faculty were representative of the wide range of state-of-the-art research done across the disciplines tackling the role of digital technologies in the lives of individuals and societies. While, given the diversity of the group, not everybody was an expert in each of the subfields and topics presented, this made for very interesting discussions full of productive engagements between people with complementary perspectives. Student presentations showcased dissertation proposals, chapters and other works in progress. Each of these presentations was given full attention by the faculty and the group of students, and as a result created a context were productive feedback and positive engagement were the norm. Finally, the range of scheduled and impromptu social activities were crucial building blocks of a genuine group atmosphere and community building process that transcended the academic and formed lasting personal bonds.

All of this, it must be said, was made possible by the hard work, enthusiasm and clockwork organization of the OII SDP faculty and staff, led by Vicki Nash, whose warmth, cheerfulness, and intellectual generosity are imprinted on this program’s DNA. At the height of summer, set amongst Oxford’s thousand-year old architectural and historical landmarks, beautiful gardens and hubs of cutting-edge scholarship, the SDP manages to integrate creative work and fruitful intellectual exchange into a challenging and welcoming environment that strengthens both individual careers and community ties. I can’t wait to visit again.

Huge thanks and props to the OII SDP staff team (Jordan Copeland, Tim Davies, Karen Mead, Duncan Passey), as well as the featured faculty (Andy Przybylski, Chris Foster, Greg Taylor, Bernie Hogan, Ralph Schroeder, Rebecca Eynon, Marcus Foth, Reynol Junco, Scott Hale, Homero Gil de Zúñiga, Jonathan Albright, Kerk Kee, Christoph Lutz, Taha Yasseri, Stuart Shulman, Helen Margetts, Joss Wright, Eric Meyer, Kathryn Eccles, Vicki Nash, William McGeveran), and of course the amazing #OIISDP2015 cohort!

LFAL_Oxford_2015_cropLuis Felipe Alvarez León is a PhD Candidate in Geography at UCLA studying the political, economic and regulatory dimensions of the digital economy.

Home: // Twitter: @lfalvarezleon

“It is difficult not to become enamored with the enchantment of the city” — Frances Bachstein remembers her time at SDP2015

By: Frances Nichols Bachstein

Chimes softly ring through the stately vine covered walls of the ancient bastion of learning marking a lovely new day. The stone streets begin to fill with the first tour groups of the morning as you walk past famous landmarks and buildings to Balliol College where a smile greets you with a friendly welcome at the door. Fresh coffee and tea wafts through the bright and modern corridors as it guides you to the fresh possibilities of learning.

It is difficult to place into words how the OII’s Summer Doctoral Programme profoundly influenced my dissertation work! Vicki Nash, and the staff of the OII foster such a great safe environment to share and explore the students’ work. My collegues’ research encompasses the globe, and held a common thread of shared interests and issues. As a group, we explored and shared our experiences with research, articles, concepts, mental health, and coping with the stressors of life and work balance. The guest lecturers are at the top of their fields and imparted fascinating information, techniques, and advice for ‘winning the academic game’.

Lunches were amazing, congregating on the verdant lawn of the courtyard of Balliol College discussing the highlights of the morning conversations. It is truly brilliant when ego is set aside and a variety of topics are earnestly discussed in a non-threatening manner. Academics were only part of the charm of OII. Punting on the Thames was truly an Oxford experience. The punts are given to novices and it often acts more as bumper boats than their true purpose. However, the stressors of the day float away as you enjoy strawberries and Prosecco with new friends and soak in the sun of a bright Oxford afternoon. Picnicking in the meadows, running through the streets into the early morning mists of Christ Church Meadow, experiencing a ghost tour, bowling, exploring the many museums, and a pint with new friends are some of the social side of OII, which ensorcells the stay.

Oxford is more than ancient buildings and new ideas, it is Narnia, Wonderland, Hogwarts, and Middle Earth! It is difficult not to become enamored with the enchantment of the city as you lounge on a roof top bar with the sun setting in the azure sky over the Bodleian Library, or enjoying a good meal in a quaint garden restaurant far from the bustle of the cobble streets. Like all good things, the enchantment must end. You sit in great hall of Hertford College and think of all the other scholars who graced the hall before you, as the candles are lit for a fantastic formal dinner, marking the end of the OII SDP2015. Although leaving Oxford is bittersweet you find a renewed energy for your work and camaraderie with new colleagues! I highly recommend the programme.

picture-483-1444770899 SDP2015 alumna Frances Nichols Bachstein is a PhD Candidate at the University of Tennessee. Her dissertation research focuses on secrecy in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields and the communication process of scientific disclosure; with a particular interest in nuclear agencies, institutional trust, ways to promote understanding to vulnerable or uninformed parts of the population, physical and cyber security, and social media.

Is This Heaven? No, It’s OII SDP

By: Stacy Blasiola

The time I had with my cohort at the OII SDP remains one of the most meaningful experiences I’ve had in my academic career. As an American, I’m struggling not to use the word “awesome” but seriously, it was awesome. I’ll tell you a little bit about why, and I hope you’ll forgive the overwhelming nostalgia. Dr Nash has created a two week program that lasts a lifetime. Looking back, I think there are two key aspects of the SDP that make it happen: The people and the place.

The SDP brings together doctoral students who are in an advanced state of their degrees. This means that all of the participants are going through similar challenges and struggles. In the months leading up to OII SDP 2014, I was done with courses and focused exclusively on prelim preparation. As OII SDP 2013 alum Iona Literat noted, this can be an overwhelmingly lonely time. Academic writing is creative, and yet it can be difficult to find inspiration given the solitary nature of the work. If you don’t know it now, you’ll find that having peers makes doing the work a lot more fun, and it also opens doors for collaboration. When you spend two weeks at the Oxford Internet Institute with a cohort of enthusiastic, young scholars, you emerge with some new friends and a powerful support group.

As part of the self-described “best OII SDP cohort ever”, we continue to encourage each other. Since leaving the OII, I’ve worked with several members of my cohort on the Graduate Student Advisory Board for the journal Social Media + Society. We are planning panels for upcoming conferences, and a few us are co-authoring papers together. We visit each other when we travel, and we share rooms at conferences. And even now, as I write this, I’m chatting on Facebook about my dissertation with a fellow SDPer. This is what people mean when they say you make friendships that last.

In addition to the people, the place was what made SDP memorable for me. As an American, it’s an experience to be somewhere that has history. And when you think of all the scholars who have been through Oxford, a sense of amazement takes over. Everywhere, the city reminds you of its great thinkers of centuries past, and being in the presence of it all makes for a special time.

But more than just scenery, there’s something intangible about the environment that you can draw on. There’s a creative current that flows through the buildings; it’s in the smell of the old books, and etched on the walls. I wanted to tap into that feeling. Every day I made sure to spend some time alone. I got a library card for the Bodleian and spent hours in Duke Humfrey’s (that’s the library featured in Harry Potter and A Discovery of Witches) working on my dissertation proposal. I visited several of the museums. I rented a bike for the week exploring every back street I could find, and I’m sure I wasted a day in Blackwell’s Books. Although these were moments I spent with myself, they were far from solitary. In fact, they were regenerative.

As you can probably tell, I remember my OII SDP experience fondly. It was an opportunity to make lifelong friends, meet future collaborators, experience the beautiful city of Oxford, and be reminded of the reason we’re all doing this thing called academia.

Stacy_BlasiolaStacy Blasiola is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She is the editorial assistant for the Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media and Social Media + Society. She is working on her dissertation proposal, “Algorithms and the Misrepresentation of Self in Everyday Life.” You can find her on Twitter @blasiola.

Falling back in love with the halls of academia: top 10 moments from SDP 2014

Lindsay_Megan_2014Megan Lindsay is a fourth year doctoral student in the School of Social Work, Arizona State University. Her research focuses on the use of ICTs and the impact these technologies have on human development. Her work has primarily focused on dating relationships and whether ICTs play a role in the way partners interact, particularly the new ways of relating, and building a sense of identity and intimacy. She has spent the past two years working with a multisite research team to produce and test a dating safety smart phone application targeted toward college females.

At the beginning of a PhD programme, we start out with great energy and nearly child-like excitement for the process — at least I did. However, as time pressed on, I began wondering where the momentum went and how I could get it back.

The Summer Doctoral Programme is perfect for students looking to renew their energy and fall back in love with the halls of academia. Whether you are a first-year PhD student still trying to define a research question or struggling through the painstaking process of actually writing your dissertation, the Oxford Internet Institute’s Summer Doctoral Programme reminded me of all the things I loved about academia and reinvigorated me in a way I had not thought possible.

The SDP, in and of itself, is a masterful montage of what an academic career potentially entails and its picturesque setting oftentimes made me feel as if I were a character in a movie. For that reason, I decided to share my “top ten movie moments” from my time at the OII during Summer 2014.

Here’s to the moments I’ll never forget:

1. Oxford. The city of Oxford, loaded with buildings hundreds of years old, has such a rich history that it is both humbling and inspiring to explore.

2. Magical powers not included. However, you can actually study in the same place where Harry Potter became a wizard.

3. The food, the food, the food. Participants are treated to delicious and ornate meals. Thank you, Mom, for forcing me to attend church activities explaining table etiquette.

4. Tea time. Post-dinner conversations concerning our shared research interests with coffee, tea, and delicious after-dinner chocolates that melt in your mouth. The Kenneth Burke analogy of academia seems all too fitting.

5. The cameos. During our first week, Vicki Nash, SDP Programme Director, informed us that the one and only Professor Judy Wajcman was going to be visiting the OII for a social function to which we were all invited. A meet and greet with one of the greats ensued. We did, however, resist the urge to ask Professor Wajcman for her autograph, but she graciously posed for a photo with us, a photo proudly displayed on our Facebook walls, and someday, our office walls.

6. The Bill Spectre Ghost Tour. A ghost tour was a fun reminder of our own mortality and the things in life that are just too difficult to quantify. A fun introduction to the “dark side” of the city.

7. To punt, or not to punt? Do it. You will like it more than you think. Mostly because it’s the perfect chance for calm relaxing connection with nature — or a great reminder that motor skills are not everyone’s gift.

8. Sports Day. Imagine running, very quickly, with an egg on a spoon. Well, it shows the carnal competition everyone already knows exists in the academic world.

9. Happy Hour. After you lose the egg race — at least in my case — you can enjoy a cider (or more) at the local pub. They will have you feeling merry in no time.

10. Lifelong friends. Although you come as strangers, after punting and the egg race and the other exciting experiences enjoyed at the OII, what you are left with is a group of new friends, academics like you, who just shared a once-in-a-lifetime experience and are forever connected because of it. The last day will include many hugs, email exchanges, and maybe a few tears.

You may be wondering why the prestigious people of Oxford would encourage this range of experiences, but I have no doubt it was a strategic scheme. If you plan to continue in academia, for life, be prepared to step out of your own serious thoughts — take delight in the feast, fun, and people around you. “All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us” — a reminder from one of Oxford’s greatest stars, J.R.R. Tolkien, that we should learn to enjoy our journey.

SDP 2014 Students with Judy Wajcman

SDP 2014 Students meet Judy Wajcman

Through days and distances: could your dissertation use some space-time disruption?

Caroline JackCaroline Jack is a graduate researcher and doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. Her dissertation (in progress) is a history of corporate-sponsored economic literacy campaigns in the United States during the latter half of the twentieth century, in which she analyzes institutional understandings of media’s potential to induce personal transformation amongst members of the public. She posts media ephemera and other archival findings on Twitter: @cjack.

If you’re in the middle of researching and writing up a thesis, you’ve likely spent the last few years finding your footing. You’ve been figuring out which questions interest you and learning how to choose the methods best suited to addressing those questions. You’ve been learning the theoretical canon in your discipline. Perhaps you’re in an interdisciplinary field, and you’ve been learning more than one disciplinary canon. At any rate, your committee’s blessing to begin your dissertation work signals that you’ve developed an understanding of one or more traditions of scholarly theory and practice.

Now, there’s a general sense in the academy that interdisciplinarity is a good thing, that a diversity of theoretical and methodological orientations will make for richer work. But in practice, the process of developing an academic identity asks each of us to figure out where we stand in relation to the methods, practices, values and theoretical orientations that are traditional for our discipline. Despite our admiration for interdisciplinarity, we may find disciplinary silos springing up around us.

Randy Lynn (OII SDP 2013) argues in this blog that the OII experience not only surmounts academic balkanization, but fosters a better future for the academy–one in which scholars identify and critique structural problems while taking a participatory, collaborative approach to envisioning new ways forward. And Ioana Literat (OII SDP 2013) meditates upon the deep personal connections that have their seedtime at OII. The academy of the future that Randy argues for doesn’t spring up overnight: it spools out through the friendships and collegial relationships Ioana describes. If we are to be the future of the academy, it is something we will become with each re-connection at conferences, with each collaboration on new works, and with each chat or email or Facebook post (or even the occasional snail-mail postcard sent on its slow path through days and distances).

Perhaps it’s my own disciplinary background in communication that leads me to think about OII SDP in terms of time and space–an obsession of media scholars for many a year. The historian Harold Innis, for example, wrote in the mid-twentieth century about different media forms and their tendencies to favor space or time in their transmission of meaning. Innis’s acolyte Marshall McLuhan argued that radio and television made a global village of the entire world. Media scholars in our own moment attend to the potentially ubiquitous, instantaneous and global reach of networked digital technologies across space and time (yet caution that intersections of income, class, gender, race, sexuality and other social categories influence both access to and use of these technologies). Thinking about the OII SDP experience in terms of time and space, I can’t help but see the experience as one in which we enter a point of richly generative rupture.

You’ll travel to an unfamiliar place, far from home. You’ll likely have at least a little bit of jet lag and a touch of culture shock. For a few weeks, your ordinary temporal routines will go out the window. And I think that these things are really crucial. The dislocation, disruption, and disorientation of travel to a faraway place can invite a traveler to become more open to his or her surroundings, to take things on their own terms, and to be unabashedly curious. The tutors and staff of OII nurture that sense of openness, and clear a space for us as participants to be fruitfully disrupted together. To be the seed of something new.

New SDP scholarship fund for outstanding students at the Creative Industries Faculty, QUT

John Hartley,

Prof. John Hartley, founding Dean of the Creative Industries Faculty, QUT.

We are really delighted to announce the establishment of a new SDP scholarship fund for outstanding students at the Creative Industries Faculty (CIF) in Queensland University of Technology. The scholarship has been established thanks to a very generous personal gift from Prof. John Hartley, who was the founding Dean of the Creative Industries Faculty and is a longstanding friend of the OII. The scholarship will enable outstanding CIF PhD students in the field of digital media and communication to attend our annual Summer Doctoral Programme, and will be available for the next 5-6 years with matched funding possible to support a second student if more than one excellent candidate is selected by OII.

This scholarship is particularly meaningful to us as it crystallises the longstanding relationship we’ve built with QUT around the Summer Doctoral Programme. In addition to sending excellent students every year, the Faculty hosted the programme in Brisbane in 2009 with great professionalism (and better weather than the typical Oxford summer…) providing a really memorable experience for our own faculty as well as the participants.

In addition to the obvious synergies of research agendas and educational goals, we’ve made many firm friends amongst the faculty during that period, two of whom (Jean Burgess, now Director of Research Training, and Marcus Foth, the Founder and Director of the Urban Informatics Lab) started out as students in our second SDP cohort in 2004. We thus see the establishment of this scholarship as a wonderful recognition of the value of SDP, from both an individual and an institution whom we greatly value working with. Thank you!

Victoria Nash, SDP Director

Marcus, Jean and Ralph Schroeder (OII) at the SDP2009: Brisbane

Marcus, Jean and Ralph Schroeder (OII) at the SDP2009: Brisbane

Students at the SDP2009, undertaken in partnership with the Creative Industries Faculty, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane. The thematic focus was on 'Creativity, Innovation and the Internet'. Credit: andresmh

Students at the SDP2009, undertaken in partnership with the Creative Industries Faculty, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane. The thematic focus was on ‘Creativity, Innovation and the Internet’. Credit: andresmh

Catching up with the SDP alumni

[posted by SDP Director Vicki Nash]

It’s one of the perks of convening the OII Summer Doctoral Programme that I get to keep in touch with the programme’s alumni as they complete their theses, apply for their first academic positions, and generally go on to achieve great things. When recently looking up what’s been published lately by the ex-SDPers, I was firstly struck by the tremendous range of research areas being covered; everything from organizational practice, to child protection, to networked protest, to smart cities.

The second thing was that the Internet has moved on so much – and so quickly – that many of the topics being researched today were unimaginable when the programme was launched back in 2003. As just one example of this, Cesar Albarran Torres (University of Sydney; SDP 2013) recently published an analysis of the emergence of mobile social gambling — a new form of media and cultural practice opened up by mobile platforms and social networking sites, that fuses social gambling and gaming (and of course raises policy challenges in terms of increased availability of gambling products to minors, and the merging of the gambling and mobile gaming industries and markets.) In other cases, our alumni have made significant contributions on topics which have persistent academic and policy relevance, such as the recent book by Elizabeth Staksrud (University of Oslo; SDP 2008) on children in the online world: risk, regulation, rights (Ashgate). Based on her PhD thesis, this important book examines whether contemporary regulation of online risk for children and teens is always legitimate and whether it results in the sacrifice of certain fundamental human rights.

Continue reading